Chemistry & Cell Components
Pages 115–163 (49 pages)
Text on page 121
Chemistry & Cell Components
NMC | Technology
NMC | Technology
Pros and Cons of Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) vs. Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) S
LFP Strength
LFP Weakness
LFP Opportunity
LFP Threat
Safety
Good cycle life
Abundance of iron
Lower Costs
Weight
Energy density
Low temperature performance
Weak material supply chain (material demand > supply)
Power
Difficult to read state of charge
Lowest recycle value
Low/mid-range/entrylevel EVs
e-Bus, e-Bicycle
Stationary storage
Cost sensitive applications
NMC
High-voltage LNMO
Na-ion battery
Regulations on energy density
Increasing material cost
NMC Strength
Energy density
Low temperature performance
Power
Strong battery supply chain
High recycle value
NMC Weakness
Cost
Safety
Ni/Co supply chain
NMC Opportunity
Long range/high-end EVs
e-Bus, e-Bicycle, e-Motorcycle
Power tools / performance sensitive applications
NMC Threat
LFP
High-voltage LNMO due to cost and thermal stability
Increasing raw material cost
Source: LFP Pros and Cons, PNNL’s LFP vs. NMC Comparison, Eco Tree Lithium’s LFP vs. NMC Comparison, BatteryBits
In 2023 Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) battery technology saw progress in energy density, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Ongoing research is aimed at optimizing cathode compositions, enhancing cycling stability, and exploring sustainable materials. Cutting-edge NMC battery research in 2023 centered on advanced cathode formulations, incorporating super-high nickel content for increased energy density. Overall, state-of-the-art NMC battery research is aimed at pushing the boundaries of performance, safety, and sustainability. Leading the charge in NMC battery production in 2023 were major players like CATL, LG Energy Solution, SK On, and Samsung SDI.
Extracted from the PDF; charts and images may read imperfectly.
Page 121 · 7/49