Cell Design and Materials: Li-Ion
Pages 297–359 (63 pages)
Text on page 321
Differences between LFP and LMFP Structure
LMFP partially replaces Fe in LFP with Mn.
Incorporating Mn into the system raises the redox voltage, resulting in increased overall energy density. Performance
LMFPʼs capacity at low-temperature performance is more stable compared to LFP.
Both chemistries exhibit similar safety profiles.
High voltage and high surface area of LMFP limit cycle life due to electrolyte oxidation and Mn-dissolution Market & Usage
LMFP64 60% Mn content) is the most widely available composition in the market, with research efforts now shifting towards 70% Mn content.
LMFP is often blended with NMC due to its similar voltage, which improves the safety and reduces the cost relative to NMC.
MN/FE RATIO IN LMFP NOMINAL VOLTAGE, PRACTICAL CAPACITY, ENERGY DENSITY LFP 0% Mn 3.4V
20% Mn* 3.44V
40% Mn 3.48V
60% Mn 3.64V
80% Mn 3.96V
LMP 100%Mn 3.95V
161.0 mAh/g 534.9 Wh/kg
161.7 mAh/g 553.5 Wh/kg
157.4 mAh/g 557.0 Wh/kg
142.4 mAh/g 515.8 Wh/kg
126.3 mAh/g 459.9 Wh/kg
63.0 mAh/g 230.6 Wh/kg 20% Mn: LiMn0.2Fe0.8PO4
Source: Guoyuan Securities, Battery Report 2023 (pg125, Argonne NL battery model, Leslie et al. 2024 JES 171 040520
Extracted from the PDF; charts and images may read imperfectly.
Page 321 · 25/63