VFBATTERY REPORT

Industry Value Chain

Pages 21–49 (29 pages)

Battery Report 2025, page 45: Industry Value Chain
Text on page 45

AMBRI Learnings & Takeaways Invention vs. Innovation

Investors Diversification

Due to the uniqueness of the technology, Ambri was forced to design and build much of its own machinery, which introduced a high risk of limited scalability.

Ambri experienced sudden investment withdrawals on two occasions, leaving the company without viable alternatives and forcing it to absorb significant consequences.

While a unique value proposition UVP) creates a high barrier to entry, it simultaneously increases the time-to-market and capital intensity, as the firm must build a bespoke industrial ecosystem from the ground up rather than plugging into existing global supply chains.

Source: previous slide, company announcements

For industrial-scale "hard-tech," the failure of a single anchor investor can create a catastrophic domino effect. There has to be a "Plan B" funding sources and avoid over-leveraging the commitment of any single investor.

Scaling Risks There is a critical disconnect between market demand and capital readiness. Having $1.7 billion in potential sales does not solve a liquidity crisis when the cost of "building a battery plant from scratch" is prohibitively high. Startups should consider licensing or joint ventures JVs early on to offload manufacturing capital expenditures CapEx until their technology reaches full commercial maturity

Industry Reality Intellectual property and technical success cannot save a company if it fails to bridge the "valley of death" between prototype and delivery at scale. Restructuring can clear debt, but it cannot fix a fundamental lack of capital required for heavy industrialization.

Extracted from the PDF; charts and images may read imperfectly.

Page 45 · 25/29